High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
The Commissioner Trade Tax U.P. v. S/S Air Tack Pvt. Ltd. - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. 2986 of 2004 [2006] RD-AH 18763 (6 November 2006)
|
Court no.22
TRADE TAX REVISION NO. 2986 of 2004
AND
TRADE TAX REVISION NO. 2988of 2004
The Commissioner, Trade Tax, U.P. Lucknow. Applicant
Versus
S/S Air Tack Pvt. Ltd., Site-4, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad. Opp.Party.
Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.
Present two revisions under Section 11 of U.P. Trade Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act") are directed against the order of Tribunal dated 7th July, 2004 relating to the assessment year, 1997-98.
By the impugned order, Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Trade Tax and confirmed the order of the first appellate authority.
The main objection was that the dealer had a factory at Ghaziabad and Depot at Delhi. Dealer had sold the goods from Ghaziabad factory within the State of U.P., in the course of inter-State sale and in the course of export . From the Delhi Depot, sales to the extent of Rs.25,21,906/- was disclosed. The sales made from the Delhi Depot has been treated as inter-State sales from Ghaziabad factory on the ground that at the time of survey dated 11th August, 1998, Manager of the Company stated that in respect of the sales made from Ghaziabad factory, bills were raised from the Delhi Depot. Dealer had filed an explanation immediately after the survey on 11th August, 1998, stating therein that in the survey report by mistake the aforesaid fact has been stated. It was further explained that from the Delhi Depot, sales of those goods were made, which were purchased from J.S Engineers, Delhi, Singer India Ltd., Delhi and Usha Engineers, Ghaziabad and not of goods manufactured at Ghaziabad factory. It was submitted that the goods were not dispatched from Ghaziabad factory to Delhi by way of stock transfer. First appellate authority has accepted the books of account and disclosed turnover after accepting the explanation of the dealer in respect of various objections raised by the assessing authority, which has been affirmed by the Tribunal. Findings of both the appellate authorities are finding of fact. No question of law is involved in the present revisions.
In the result, both the revisions fail and are, accordingly, dismissed.
Dated.06.11.2006.
VS.
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.