SUSHEEL KAUSHIK versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Susheel Kaushik v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 23507 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18839 (7 November 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and Sri Rajul Bhargava, learned counsel for the complainant.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. No information was given to the police station concerned in respect of the dead body on 2.6.2006 but on 29.6.2006 an application  was given by  Yogendra alleging therein  that the deceased had  gone in the company of the applicant and other co-accused persons. Thereafter he did not come back but in the morning a news was published in the news paper that a dead body of unknown person was found and during investigation  at the pointing out of the applicant a cable wire used in the commission of the offence has been recovered. It is contended that the recovery was planted and even according to the prosecution version only the evidence of  last seen is against the applicant. There is no other evidence against the applicant.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Sushil Kaushik involved in case crime no. 205        of 2006  under Sections 302,201,120-B I.P.C., P.S. Highway District   Mathura be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dated: 7.11.2006

NA/23507/06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.