High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Susheel Kaushik v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 23507 of 2006  RD-AH 18839 (7 November 2006)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and Sri Rajul Bhargava, learned counsel for the complainant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. No information was given to the police station concerned in respect of the dead body on 2.6.2006 but on 29.6.2006 an application was given by Yogendra alleging therein that the deceased had gone in the company of the applicant and other co-accused persons. Thereafter he did not come back but in the morning a news was published in the news paper that a dead body of unknown person was found and during investigation at the pointing out of the applicant a cable wire used in the commission of the offence has been recovered. It is contended that the recovery was planted and even according to the prosecution version only the evidence of last seen is against the applicant. There is no other evidence against the applicant.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Sushil Kaushik involved in case crime no. 205 of 2006 under Sections 302,201,120-B I.P.C., P.S. Highway District Mathura be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.