RAM MURAT versus COMMISSIONER AZAMGARH DIVN. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Ram Murat v. Commissioner Azamgarh Divn. & Others - WRIT - C No. 12850 of 2003 [2006] RD-AH 1888 (24 January 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

WP No. 12850 of 2003

Hon'ble Yatindra Singh, J

Hon'ble RK Rastogi, J

Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the state of UP as respondent no.4. Standing counsel prays and is granted a month's time to file counter affidavit. Two weeks thereafter is granted for rejoinder affidavit. List this case after expiry of aforesaid period along with file of following three writ petitions:

1.WP No. 72532 of 2005

2.WP 3629 of 2006

3.WP 2443 of 2006

Date: 24.1.2006

BBL

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.