High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Vimlesh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22657 of 2006  RD-AH 18931 (8 November 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Vimlesh involved in case Crime No. 471 of 2006 under section 18/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police station Babina, district Jhansi.
Heard Sri Lal Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that compliance of mandatory provisions of section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act was not made and there are no public witnesses to the recovery. The learned counsel argued that the quantity of recovered charas is less than the commercial quantity and there is no previous criminal history of the applicant under the NDPS Act.
The learned AGA argued that the applicant is a men of criminal antecedents and recovery of charas more than small quantity was made from the possession of the applicant.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The quantity of recovered charas has been shown as about 600 gram in the recovery memo. The recovered charas was not weighed on chemical scales. The quantity of recovered charas being less than the commercial quantity, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Vimlesh involved in case Crime No. 471 of 2006 under section 18/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police station Babina, district Jhansi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.