Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Manveer Singh & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 61275 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19042 (10 November 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 61275 of 2006

Manveer Singh and others


State of U. P. and others

Hon'ble Krishna Murari, J.

Heard Sri K. K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Raj Kumar appearing for contesting respondent no. 5.

This petition arises out of proceedings under Section 34 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act (for short the ''Act').

The facts are that the name of contesting respondent  no. 5 came to be mutated on the basis of sale deed dated 28.8.1998 executed in his favour by the recorded tenure holder vide order dated 6.10.1998. Subsequently, petitioners moved a recall application dated 26.12.2001 for recall of the order on the ground that they are purchasers of the property by means of earlier sale deed dated 25.3.1994. All the courts dismissed the recall application filed by the petitioners on the ground that there is no proper explanation for delay in moving the application.

From the perusal of the facts, it is clear that the dispute between the parties is with regard to validity of the two sale deeds said to have been executed in their favour. Proceedings under Section 34 of the Act being summary in nature, the said question cannot be adjudicated in these proceedings. Proceedings being summary, no useful purpose will be served by interfering in the matter. It is always open to the petitioners to get adjudication of the rights from the competent court having jurisdiction. From the perusal of the judgment of the revisional court, it becomes clear that some civil suit between the parties with regard to the sale deed is pending. Since the parties have already approached the civil court where dispute between the parties will be effectively adjudicated, there is no reason for this court to interfere in the orders passed in summary proceedings.

The writ petition accordingly false and is dismissed in limine.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.