Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJNATH RAJBHAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajnath Rajbhar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 23946 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19050 (10 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Rajnath Rajbhar involved in case Crime No. 36 of 2006 under sections 376, 511 I.P.C. and section 3 (i) (xi) of SC/ST Act, Police station Sarnath, district Varanasi.

Heard Sri Hari Om Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is said to have touched the face and body of minor girl aged 7 years. The learned counsel pointed out that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted for the offence under section 354 I.P.C. and section 3 (i) (xi) of SC/ST Act. The learned counsel urged that  the applicant is in jail for the last about  eight months.

The learned AGA submitted that the conduct of the applicant is deplorable. The learned counsel argued that the applicant after removing  the garments of a girl aged  7 years was found touching her face and body.

Having taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties  and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Rajnath Rajbhar involved in case Crime No. 36 of 2006 under sections 376, 511 I.P.C. and section 3 (i) (xi) of SC/ST Act, Police station Sarnath, district Varanasi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/- 10.11.2006

Mahmood-23946-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.