High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Pintoo v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 24668 of 2006  RD-AH 19203 (14 November 2006)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant , learned A.G.A.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He has not been put up for identification. It is alleged that from the possession of the applicant one mobile phone having without sim, a sum of Rs. 1800/- along with country made pistol were recovered, but the alleged recovery is not connected with the articles looted in the said incident. Co-accused Rohit has been released on bail by this court on 1.11.2006 in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 23462 of 2006.
In reply of the above submissions the learned A.G.A. submits that the applicant is having criminal antecedents.
After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Pintoo involved in Case Crime No. 202 of 2006, under Sections 394, 302, and 411 I.P.C. Police Station Ramraj, District Muzaffarnagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the court of learned C.J. M. concerned in the first week of each month about his behaviour and good conduct till the conclusion of the trial. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.
In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.