High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Ram Gopal & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 14137 of 2006  RD-AH 19210 (14 November 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Ram Gopal and Mahesh involved in case Crime No. 89 of 2006 under section 386, I.P.C., Police station Sasni, district Hathras (Mahamaya Nagar).
Heard Sri G.S.Hajela, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that complainant's wife having not delivered the gun to the applicants no case under section 386 I.P.C. is made out. The learned counsel argued that the applicants are in jail for the last more than four months. The learned counsel urged that the applicants are on bail in the cases shown in the criminal history.
The learned AGA contended that the applicants made extortion demand of gun and threatened to kidnap complainant's son. The learned counsel argued that applicants being men of criminal antecedents they will indulge in the commission of other offences after being released.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The informant and his wife having not delivered any article or weapon to the applicants, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicants Ram Gopal and Mahesh involved in case Crime No. 89 of 2006 under section 386, I.P.C., Police station Sasni, district Hathras (Mahamaya Nagar), be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.