Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHHOTE LAL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Chhote Lal v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11423 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19239 (15 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Chhotey Lal  indicted in case crime No. 21  of 2005  under sections 363, 366, 376  I.P.C. P.S.Usrahar  District Etawah.

Heard Shri V.K. Agnihotry , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the girl left her house at 10 P.M. without informing her parents who were asleep. The learned counsel argued that the conduct of the girl reveals that she was a consenting party. The learned counsel contended that the radiological age of the girl is 18-19 years. The learned counsel submitted that according to medical report no definite opinion about the commission of rape could be given.

The learned A.G.A. argued that the girl in her statements under sections 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C.  has made allegation of commission of gang rape against the applicant and co-accused and injury caused by blunt object was found on private part.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The radiological age of the girl is 18-19 years. The girl left her home at night without informing her parents. The girl appears to be a consenting party. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Chhotey Lal  indicted in case crime No. 21  of 2005  under sections 363, 366, 376  I.P.C. P.S.Usrahar  District Etawah , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/11423/06

15.11.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.