Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PAPPAN AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Pappan And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16665 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19404 (16 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants                       Pappan and Guddu alias Gyanendra involved in case Crime No. 91 of 2006 under sections 379, 411, I.P.C., Police station Dadri, district Gautam Budh Nagar.

Heard Sri Satish Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that first information report was lodged twenty four days after the incident. The learned counsel argued that recovery of tractor was made from some other place and has been implanted. The learned counsel pointed out that engine number of the recovered tractor does not tally with the stolen tractor.

The learned AGA argued that recovery of stolen tractor was made from the possessions of the applicants.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The first information report  about the theft of tractor  having been made  twenty four days after the incident  and engine number  of the recovered tractor being different, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicants Pappan and Guddu alias Gyanendra involved in case Crime No. 91 of 2006 under sections 379, 411, I.P.C., Police station Dadri, district Gautam Budh Nagar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/- 16.11.2006

Mahmood-16665-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.