Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAVIRAJ versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kaviraj v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17849 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19475 (17 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Kaviraj involved in case Crime No. 800 of 2006 under sections 379, 411, 420, 467, 468, I.P.C., Police station Majhola, district Moradabad.

Heard Sri Madan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of stolen vehicle was made from the  joint possession of the applicant and co-accused who managed their escape. The learned counsel urged that  there is no criminal history of the applicant and he is in jail for the last  about five months.

The learned AGA argued that recovery of  stolen vehicle with tampered  number at plate was made from the possession of the applicant who was arrested at the spot.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. The applicant is in jail for the last about five months. There are no independent witnesses to the recovery. In view of these facts, I consider it to b e a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Kaviraj involved in case Crime No. 800 of 2006 under sections 379, 411, 420, 467, 468, I.P.C., Police station Majhola, district Moradabad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/- 17.11.2006

Mahmood-6 17849-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.