Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANJAY KUMAR SAROJ versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sanjay Kumar Saroj v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT TAX No. 1694 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19515 (17 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.32

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1694 of 2006

Sanjay Kumar Saroj .....Petitioner

Versus

State of U.P. & others .....Respondents

*******

Hon'ble S.Rafat Alam, J.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

In the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to accept the amount of passenger tax worth Rs.1,55,345/- in easy instalments.

We have heard Sri R.C.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

It is contended that since the mother of the petitioner was suffering from cancer and ultimately died on 13th September, 2005, the amount assessed against the passenger tax could not be deposited in time. He further submits that at least easy instalments may be fixed for the deposit of the assessed amount.

We do not find any force in the submission for the reason that the amount of tax is for the period from September, 2001 to 31st October, 2005. Passenger tax is realized from the passengers and, therefore, there appears to be no justification for retaining the amount of tax realized from the passengers by the petitioner for such a long time. That apart, it appears that the petitioner was plying the vehicle without there being a valid permit and the said irregularity and illegality committed by the petitioner was noticed during the surprise checking conducted by the transport authorities. Thus, for the above reason, the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief under the writ jurisdiction of this Court.

The writ petition being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed in limine.

Dated: 17.11.2006

SKM


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.