Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANOOP KOL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anoop Kol v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25456 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19554 (20 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard  learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. His name has been disclosed by co-accused and no looted property has been recovered from his possession. The applicant is having no criminal antecedents. Co-accused Mohd.  Isha @ Dangar, Ramaiya Pal  and Munna Harijan have been released on bail by this court on 21.2.2006, 14.7.2006 and 14.7.2006 in Criminal Misc Bail Applications No. 3436 of 2006, 13676 of 2006 and 13672 of 2006 respectively. The case of the applicant is also on the same footing with the case of above mentioned co-accused.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without  expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.  

Let the applicant  Anoop Kol involved in Case Crime No. 51 of 2004, under Sections 396, 307, 333 and 412 I.P.C. and Sections ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Naugarh, District  Chandauli be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy  sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month about his behaviour and good conduct till the conclusion of the trial. It shall be open to the learned  C.J.M. concerned to cancel the bail of the applicant, if it is reported otherwise by the S.O. concerned and the applicant  shall not tamper with the evidence.  

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel.

Dt: 21.11.2006

Rcv/25456-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.