Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DINESH SINGH versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dinesh Singh v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 24711 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19571 (20 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Dinesh Singh involved in case Crime No. 76 of 2006 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 324, 325, 323, 504, 506, 352, 120-B, I.P.C. and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police station Dubhar, district Ballia.

Heard Sri A.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is a cross case of the incident case Crime No. 76-A of 2006 under sections 147, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and co-accused Sudarshan Singh has been granted bail by an order of this Court dated 14.11.2006 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.  24907 of 2006 and the case of the applicant is analogous.

The learned AGA argued that the applicant and co-accused subjected to assault and inflicted injuries to seven persons.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

There is cross case of the incident. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Dinesh Singh involved in case Crime No. 76 of 2006 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 324, 325, 323, 504, 506, 352, 120-B, I.P.C. and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police station Dubhar, district Ballia, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/- 20.11.2006

Mahmood-24711-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.