Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MEERA SINGH versus NAGAR PANCHAYAT KERAKAT & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Meera Singh v. Nagar Panchayat Kerakat & Others - WRIT - A No. 37213 of 1999 [2006] RD-AH 19601 (20 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 36

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 37213 of 1999

Meera Singh

Vs.

Nagar Panchyat Jaunpur and others

Hon. Pankaj Mithal,J

Heard Sri R.S. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vikas Sahai learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3.

A substantive post of Tax Collector at Nagar Panchyat Kerakat, district Jaunpur fell vacant due to retirement of one Mohd. Shamim. On the said post the petitioner was appointed with effect from 4.5.1995 on temporary basis. The said post on which the petitioner was appointed was created by the State Government vide order dated 7th July 1987 and the sanction to the said post has not been cancelled, revoked or withdrawn by the State Government so far. However by the impugned order dated 31.5.1999 the services of the petitioner were terminated by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchyat on the ground that the post on the which the petitioner was working has been abolished by the Nagar Panchyat in its meeting held on 31.5.1999 itself.

The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that a post which has been created by the State Government cannot be abolished by the Nagar Panchyat and therefore the termination of the petitioner on the ground of abolition of the post is totally arbitrary and unjustified. In the counter affidavit filed by Sri K.M. Garg, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 Director, Local bodies U.P. Lucknow, it has been admitted that the power to create or sanction a post of Tax collector vests with the State Government. The respondent No. 3 in the counter affidavit has  nowhere alleged or denied that the post of Tax Collector on which the petitioner was working was not created and sanctioned by the State Government or that it has ceased to exist. It only states that the Director, Local Bodies has not sanctioned the same. In other words, it is the admitted case of the parties that the post of Tax Collector at Nagar Panchyat Kerakat was created and sanctioned by the State Government and it is continuing.

In view of the above submission impugned order dated 31.5.1999 terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground that the post has been abolished is unsustainable under law. The post which has been created by the State Government cannot be abolished by a mere resolution of the Nagar Panchyat. The Nagar Panchyat has no power or jurisdiction to undo the act of the State government. Therefore the termination of the services on the above ground as mentioned in the impugned order dated 31.5.1999 is invalid.

The writ petition is therefore allowed and the impugned order dated 31.5.1999 is quashed.

20.11.2006

SKS


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.