Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MULA CHANDRA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mula Chandra v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15771 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19605 (20 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Mula Chandra involved in case Crime No. 25 of 2005 under sections 392, 307, I.P.C., Police station Kadoura, district Jalaun.

Heard Sri Ajay Sengar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the first information report. According to the learned counsel the name of the applicant figured in the supplementary statement of the injured. The learned counsel submitted that the injured in his third statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. assigned the role of opening fire at the injured to co-accused Kallu Singh, who has been enlarged on bail by an order of this Court dated 30.11.2005 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20509 of 2005.

The learned AGA argued that there is criminal history of the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The applicant has not been named in the first information report. The name of the applicant came to fore in the supplementary statement of the injured. Co-accused Kallu Singh has been granted bail by an order of this Court dated 30.11.2005. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Mula Chandra involved in case Crime No. 25 of 2005 under sections 392, 307, I.P.C., Police station Kadoura, district Jalaun, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/- 20.11.2006

Mahmood-15771-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.