High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Tejpal v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25115 of 2006  RD-AH 19642 (20 November 2006)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version the alleged occurrence had taken place in the dark hours of night on 24.7.2006 since 10.00 p.m. to 12.00 p.m. The F.I.R. has been lodged on 25.7.2006 at about 11.30 a.m. The distance of the police station was about 14 k.m.. The F.I.R. has been lodged after the recovery of the dead body. According to the F.I.R. the applicant has made a confessional statement before Lokesh wife of the deceased. During investigation it is said that the evidence of last seen has been collected by the I.O. it is surprising that in the present case inquest report has been prepared on the information given by Brij Pal Pradhan of the village whereas the F.I.R. has been lodged by Prem Chand son of Tarif.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Tejpal involved in case crime no. 339 of 2006 under Sections 302,452,307 I.P.C.,P.S. Kandhala District Muzaffarnagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.