Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SULTAN SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sultan Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15616 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19843 (22 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sultan Singh  indicted in case crime No. 221  of  2006 under sections 342, 364-A, 394,   I.P.C. P.S. New Agra  District Agra.

Heard Shri Anil Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the First Information Report or in the statement of the abductee. The learned counsel urged that the name of the applicant came to light from the statement of co-accused Manoj Kumar and Raman Yadav.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that recovery of mobile set of abductee was made in pursuance of the disclosure statement of the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

 The abductee managed his escape from the clutches of miscreants. The abductee has not named the applicant in his statement under section 161 Cr.P.c. The name of the applicant figured in the confessional statement of the co-accused. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Sultan Singh indicted in case crime No. 221 of 2006 under sections 342, 364-A, 394, I.P.C. P.S. New Agra District Agra, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/15616/06

22.11.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.