Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MAHENDRA SINGH & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mahendra Singh & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 7171 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19907 (23 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Hon'ble Shiv Charan, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have also perused the judgment under appeal.

Admit.

Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 6319 of 2006.

Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.

It is contended that co-accused Pahar Singh was alleged to have exhorted his associates to kill Bhoopat, was bailed out by a Bench of this Court on 19.10.2006. The present two appellants have been assigned the role of catching hold the deceased and main role of shooting was assigned to Puspendra who was found to be a juvenile and is facing trial separately. Both the appellants were on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.

Looking to the role assigned to the present appellants, we order that both the appellants shall be released on bail during pendency of appeal.

Let the appellants-Mahendra Singh and Shiv Pal Singh be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing bonds of two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Mahoba in S.T. No. 217 of 2002 State Vs. Mahendra Singh and others.

If each of the appellants deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- as fine within a period of one month  from today in the court below, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed against them during pendency of appeal.

23.11.2006

OP/7171/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.