High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Mahendra Singh & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 7171 of 2006  RD-AH 19907 (23 November 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Shiv Charan, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have also perused the judgment under appeal.
Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 6319 of 2006.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that co-accused Pahar Singh was alleged to have exhorted his associates to kill Bhoopat, was bailed out by a Bench of this Court on 19.10.2006. The present two appellants have been assigned the role of catching hold the deceased and main role of shooting was assigned to Puspendra who was found to be a juvenile and is facing trial separately. Both the appellants were on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.
Looking to the role assigned to the present appellants, we order that both the appellants shall be released on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellants-Mahendra Singh and Shiv Pal Singh be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing bonds of two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Mahoba in S.T. No. 217 of 2002 State Vs. Mahendra Singh and others.
If each of the appellants deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- as fine within a period of one month from today in the court below, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed against them during pendency of appeal.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.