Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUKESH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mukesh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25683 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19913 (23 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is  not named in the F.I.R. the name of the applicant has been disclosed by co-accused Tejveer Singh and Kuldeep Singh. There is not other evidence against the applicant. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant or at his pointing out. Co-accused Tejveer Singh and Kuldeep Singh have been released on bail by this court on 30.10.2006 in Criminal Misc Bail Application No.22860 of 2006.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Mukesh involved in case crime no.  171 of 2006, ,  under Sections 302 and 120-B/34  I.P.C.    P.S.  Sadar Bazar  District Meerut be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and  two  sureties  to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the court of learned C.J.M. in the first week of each month about his behaviour and good conduct till the conclusion of the trial  and the applicant  shall not tamper with the evidence.  

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel.

Dated:  23.11.2005

Rcv/25683-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.