Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJENDRA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajendra v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17657 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 19921 (23 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Rajendra involved in case Crime No. 62 of 2006 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471  I.P.C. and  section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Chatari, district Bulandshahar.

Heard Sri K.S. Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of stolen motorcycle was made from the possession of co-accused Asif. The learned counsel pointed out that complainants of stolen motorcycles identified the co-accused Asif, Mukesh and Bobby as the persons who committed theft of their motorcycles. The learned counsel argued that the applicant was not identified by the complainants.

The learned AGA submitted that there is criminal history of the applicant and in case of release on bail he is likely to commit other offences of theft and robbery.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

It is a case of no injury and recovery of stolen motorcycles was made  from the possession of co-accused. The applicant was pillion rider. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Rajendra involved in case Crime No. 62 of 2006 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Chatari, district Bulandshahar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and an undertaking that he will not misuse the liberty of bail by indulging in the commission of crime or anti social activities after being released on bail.

D/- 23.11.2006

Mahmood-17657-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.