High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Ram Chandra Singh & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 7188 of 2006  RD-AH 19925 (23 November 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Shiv Charan, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have perused the impugned judgment also.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that no specific role has been assigned to Smt. Ram Pyari, the appellant no. 2. She is said to have instigated her son Ram Chandra Singh to commit murder of Smt. Sunita Devi. She was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.
Looking to all facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on behalf of the parties, we are inclined to release Smt. Ram Pyari, the appellant no.2 on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant no. 2 Smt. Ram Pyari be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on her executing a personal bond and furnishing bonds of two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Fatehpur in S.T. No. 217 of 1994 State Vs. Ram Chandra Singh and others.
The appellant no. 2 is allowed one month time from today to deposit the entire amount of fine in the court below.
The bail prayer of appellant no.1 Ram Chandra Singh shall be considered after receipt of record on 14.2.2007.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.