Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAHUL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rahul v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 26020 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20137 (28 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and  learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He has not been put up for identification, but after 18 days of the alleged occurrence the applicant was apprehended and from his possession one stolen ring and a sum of Rs. 21,00/- were recovered. Co-accused Pintoo, who was arrested along with the applicant, has been released on bail by this court on 14.11.2006 in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 24668 of 2006.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without  expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Rahul involved in Case Crime No. 202 of 2006, under Sections 302 and 394 and 411 I.P.C.,  Police Station   Ramraj , District Muzaffarnagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy   sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the court of learned C.J. M. concerned in the first week of each month about his behaviour and good conduct till the conclusion of the trial. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.  

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel.

Dt: 28.11.2006

Rcv/26020-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.