High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Suhel v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25989 of 2006  RD-AH 20166 (28 November 2006)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R.. He has not been put up for identification. The only evidence against the applicant is that from his possession one looted Titan watch has been recovered. The recovery is not supported by any independent witness. There is no other evidence against the applicant.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Suhel involved in case crime no. 1161 of 2006 under Sections 396,411 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Farrukhabad District Farrukhabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.