Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Surendra Kumar Agarwal v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 64775 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20168 (28 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.10

             Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 64775 of 2006                        

Surendra Kumar Agarwal . . . . . . .  . . .. . . . ...  . .  .  . .Petitioner.

                                   Versus

State of U.P. and others  . . . . .  . . . .  . . .  . .  . . . .  .   . Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition for quashing  the impugned order dated 14.6.2006 ( Annexure no.1 to the writ petition ) passed by respondent no.3 and also for a direction to the respondents  not to allot the plot in question during pendency of the writ petition.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned  Counsel for the  contesting  respondents.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the Writ Petition with all Annexures before concerned competent authority within three weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned  competent authority shall decide the same  within eight weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 28.11.2006

RPP.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.