High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Phoolwati v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 6109 of 2006  RD-AH 2255 (30 January 2006)
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of finally at the state without calling for a counter affidavit.
Challenging the election of the respondent no.3 a Gram Pradhan of the village in question, the petitioner has filed an election petition no. 2 of 2005, which is pending before the respondent no.2. The submission of the petitioner is that although the petitioner has approached the respondent no.2 for expeditious disposal of the election petition, the same has not been heard and decided as yet.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that the election petition no.2 of 2005 pending before the respondent no.2, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Debai, Bulandshahar shall be heard and disposed of, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other concerned parties, if there be any, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four moths from the date of a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.