Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM CHANDRA GUPTA versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Chandra Gupta v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 10374 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 4085 (21 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. R.K. Agrawal, J.

Hon. (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

Heard Sri Swapnil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vipin Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2.

At the out set learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is prepared to pay the entire dues, which is, ought to be recovered as arrears of land revenue in some easy instalments.

Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the entire outstanding amount shall be deposited in four equal quarterly instalments. The first instalment shall be deposited on or before 30.3.2006, the second instalment shall be deposited on or before 30.6.2006, the third instalment shall be deposited on or before 30.9.2006 and the last instalment along with upto date interest which may include after issuance of the recovey notice on or before 31.12.2006. The recovery proceeding pursuant to the notice dated 21.8.2003 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) shall remain stayed initially upto 31.3.2006 and if the petitioner deposits the first instalment, as directed above, further proceeding peruant to the notice shall remain stayed till 30.6.2006 and likewise in order to enable the petitioner to deposit the entire amount. In the event of default the order staying the recovery shall cease to have no effect and the authorities will be at liberty to proceed to recover the amount in accordance with law. This order will come into force in case the petitioner has not been granted any order from this Court earlier for the payment of the dues in question for the instalments.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

D/-21.2.2006

Mahmood-10374-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.