High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Geeta Yadav v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 1620 of 2006  RD-AH 653 (10 January 2006)
HON. ARUN TANDON, J.
Petitioner is directed to implead Chief Development Officer as Respondent no. 5 during the course of the day. Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the newly added respondent.
Against the appointment of respondent no. 4 as Anganbari Karyakarti, which according to the petitioner is illegal, petitioner has already made a representation before the Chief Development Officer, Azamgarh dated 14.9.2005 which has gone unattended. Hence the present writ petition.
In the facts and circumstances of the case writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon Chief Development Officer to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 14.9.2005 within four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before him. He shall pass a reasoned speaking order.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.