Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LAV versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lav v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 23378 of 2005 [2006] RD-AH 6636 (27 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO. 54

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 23378 OF 2005

Lav.................................Applicant.

Versus

State of U.P........................Opposite Party.

Hon. Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

The applicant is not named in the First Information Report.  His complicity was revealed after four months by one of the co-accused.  It is submitted that the applicant was riding rickshaw in Delhi and was not aware that he was implicated in the murder case.  The trial against other co-accused commenced vide Session Trial No. 285 of 2003, which ended in conviction of accused Smt. Mithlesh Sharma, whereas another co-accused Subhash whose role is identical to that of the present applicant, has been acquitted. The judgment dated 18.1.2005 passed in Session Trial No. 285 of 2003 has been brought on record by means of the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is resident of Mathura.  The bail application is allowed since identically placed co-accused Subhash has been given clear acquittal by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, court no.13 F.T.C., Mathura.  

Let the applicant  Lav  be released on bail in Case Crime No. 9 of 2002, under Sections 302, 201, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station Vrindaban, District Mathura on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the condition that he shall be present on each and every date during the trial.  In the event, he absents himself on a single date in future, this order shall automatically stand cancelled and proceeding shall be initiated to take the applicant into custody.

Learned Additional Sessions Judge, court no.13 F.T.C., Mathura is directed to complete the trial expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.

Dt. 27.3.2006

rkg


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.