High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Suresh Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 21854 of 2006  RD-AH 8098 (20 April 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
The fair price shop licence of respondent no.4 was cancelled on 16.1.2003. He filed an appeal which was dismissed on 30.6.2004. Then he filed Writ Petition no. 6678 of 2005 in this Court which was allowed on 24.8.2005 and the order was quashed with liberty to respondents to complete inquiry after giving chargesheet and fresh opportunity to the respondent no.4. The petitioner's allegation is that the respondent no.3 thereafter restored the shop of respondent no. 4 and is not doing any inquiry, hence, the present writ petition.
We have heard counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondents.
According to the petitioner the High Court has not prohibited completion of the inquiry and inquiry should be completed and thereafter appropriate orders should be passed.
In the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate that the petitioner may file a fresh representation before respondent no. 3. In case the representation is filed, it may be decided by the said respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the representation. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
Needless to say that respondent no. 3 before passing any order on the representation of the petitioner will also give an opportunity to respondent no.4.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.