High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Mahatama Bharti v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 22766 of 2006  RD-AH 8425 (26 April 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
This is a writ petition against the order dated 5.4.2006 passed by respondent no. 2.
We have heard counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondents.
In the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate that the petitioner may file a fresh representation before respondent no. 3 within a month. In case the representation is filed, it may be decided by the said respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the representation. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.