Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TULA RAM versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Tula Ram v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6527 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 8765 (1 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is Second bail  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Tula Ram indicted in case crime No.717  of 2003 (S.T. No. 251 of 2003 under section 302  I.P.C. P.S. Kowali Farrukhabad District Farrukhabad .

Heard Shri R.S. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

      The First Bail Application moved on behalf of the applicant was rejected on merit by an order dated 13.4.2005 passed by this court. This court while rejecting the bail application had directed the trial court to make an endeavour to dispose of the case expeditiously within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of  the order dated 13.4.2005. The certified copy of the order was produced on 8.5.2005. The evidence of three prosecution witnesses has been recorded. A perusal of the order sheet indicates that prosecution witnesses appeared on some dates but could not be examined due to the presiding officer being on leave and non appearance of the applicant-accused.

      No case for grant of   bail is made out.          

      The Second Bail Application moved on behalf of the applicant Tula Ram is hereby rejected. The Additional District and Sessions Judge, room No. 5 Farrukhabad is directed to dispose of  session trial No. 251 of 2003 State Vs. Tula Ram under section 302 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Farrukhabad District Farrukhabad within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced by the applicant.

Aks/6527/06

1.5.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.