Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NAGESHWAR AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Nageshwar And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 26319 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 10365 (4 June 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. SHISHIR KUMAR, J

By means of the present writ petition the petitioners have approached this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the objection first without holding the election.

The petitioners submit that earlier the petitioners have approached this Court regarding adjournment of process of election.  The writ petition was disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to decide the objection filed by the petitioners.  Now the petitioners state that the objection filed by the petitioners has not been decided and the respondents dehors has announced the process of election to be held on 21.6.2007.  The submission of the petitioner is that it is not permissible under the Rules.  

The reliance has been placed upon a Division Bench Judgment of this Court in Rajeev Kumar Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies U.p.Lucknow and others reported in 1996 (1) UPLBEC, 70.  In support of the aforesaid contention, the petitioners submit that the election can be held only from the place where the process of earlier election came to an end.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

As the objection of the petitioners is still pending and the date of election is 21.6.2007, therefore, in my opinion, it will be appropriate that the respondent No.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Mau be directed to decide the objection of the petitioner according to law and will pass a detailed and reasoned order preferably within a period of one week from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.

With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.  

There shall be no order as to costs.  

4.6.2007

SKD

W.P. No.26319  of 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.