High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Dr. Suresh Chandra Srivastava v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 2813 of 2007  RD-AH 1054 (17 January 2007)
Hon'ble Amitava Lala,J.
The petitioner has retired from service on 31st July, 2005. But on some pretext or other the retiral benefit has not been given. He made representation on 6th October, 2006 with regard to the same. But till date no retiral benefit has been given to the petitioner. This act cannot be allowed to continue forever.
Therefore, in disposing the writ petition we direct the petitioner to make a representation to the appropriate authority within one week from the date of getting certified copy of this order and the authority concerned shall consider the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of making such representation upon giving fullest opportunity of hearing and by passing a reasoned order thereon. For the purpose of effective adjudication a copy of the writ petition along with its annexures can be treated as part and parcel of the representation.
Thus the writ petition is disposed of.
No order is passed as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.