Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJA RAM versus SRI RAVINDRA NATH PANDEY & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raja Ram v. Sri Ravindra Nath Pandey & Others - CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. 1783 of 1998 [2007] RD-AH 11382 (6 July 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

Opp. Party no. 2 is not present.

Opp. Party no. 3 is present.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner may furnish the complete details that how and in what manner the order has been disobeyed by the Opp. Party nos. 1, 2 and 3.  

Sri K. N. Misra, appears on behalf of the Opp. Party no. 3 and filed Counter-affidavit.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted ten days time to file reply.

List on 19.07.07.  

On that date, the Opp. Party no. 3 may appear in person.  The Chief Judicial Magistrate may also give the report about the service of the bailable warrant on the Opp. Party no. 2.

Dt:06.07.07.

MZ/1783/98.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.