Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRY., BASIC EDUCATION AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ramesh Chandra Yadav v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secry., Basic Education And Others - WRIT - A No. 3797 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 1353 (24 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Ran Vijai Singh,J.

This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

"(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondents   to permit  the petitioner to work  as Head Master   of Sri Dalchand Madhyamic Vidyalayan Nagla, Mehipal, Jagsaura, Etawah.

(b) respondents  be further directed to pay the salary of the post of Head Master to the petitioner.

(c) to award the cost of the writ petition to the petitioner."

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel   for the State respondents.

Learned counsel for the parties States  that the facts involved  in this writ petition  are squarely covered  by the judgment   and order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 57868 of 2006; Tilak Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others decided on 18th October,2005.

Considering the facts and  circumstances of the case, it is provided that the petitioner may file a  fresh representation before respondent No.2 In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided  by respondent No.2  by a speaking order, after hearing petitioner and newly added respondent if possible, within two months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation. The respondent No.2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dt.24.1.2007

Rkb.3797/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.