High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Km. Jayamala v. State Of U.P. Thru' Chief Secretary And Others - WRIT - A No. 35808 of 2007  RD-AH 13741 (8 August 2007)
Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner. Sri Arjun Singhal has accepted notice on behalf of respondents No. 3 and 4. Sri V. K. Singh has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No. 5. No notice is being issued to respondent no. 6. Liberty is reserved to the respondents No.6 to move an application for revocation, clarification, variation and modification of the order if they feel so aggrieved.
By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the selection of respondent no. 6 as Shiksha Mitra. Petitioner's case is that the respondent no. 6 is member of Block Development Committee and was not eligible for selection.
In view of above, it is open for the petitioner to submit representation to the District Magistrate raising her grievance with regard to selection of respondent no. 6. The District Magistrate, on such representation being submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today, may consider and take appropriate decision in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
With the above observation the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.