Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Om Prakash v. The State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. - 45297 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 15692 (18 September 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajay Srivastava appearing for respondent No.3 and learned standing counsel .

By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the recovery citation dated 18th July, 2007 issued for non payment of Rs.2,11,383/- with interest.

The petitioner took a loan of Rs. 2,00,000/- for purchase of agriculyture. The petitioner deposited some of the instalments but failed to deposit the entire amount. Subsequently the Bank initiated process of recovery.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that auction of the agricultural land has not yet taken place and he is ready to pay the amount provided he is given facility to make deposit in easy instalments. The counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner be given this opportunity only if auction has not taken place and further the petitioner is liable to pay the amount along with upto date interest and in case of committing any default the recovery be revived.

Considering the facts of the present case and the fact that the petitioner is a farmer, ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition by following directions:-

(i) The petitioner shall deposit the entire outstanding amount along with upto date interest in five instalments.

(ii) The first first instalment be paid on or before 31.10.2007 and thereafter on 31.1.2008, 30.4.2008 31.7.2008 and 31.10.2008 respectively.

(iii) In event of any default, the recovery shall stand revived. In event no attachment or auction of the immoveable property has taken place, petitioners shall not be liable to pay any recovery charges.

(iv) Subject to payment of the amount as directed above, the recovery in pursuance of the impugned notice shall remain stayed.

With the above directions the writ petition is disposed of.

Date: 18.9.2007



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.