Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


M/S National Traders Thru' Its Prop. Mohd. Murtaza Khan v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 5261 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 1608 (1 February 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No. 35

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5261 of 2007

       M/s National Traders through its Propritor Mohd. Murtaza Khan


State of U.P. & others

Hon'ble R.P.Misra, J.

Hon'ble Shishir Kumar, J.

Heard Sri A.S.Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J.S.Pandey holding the brief of Sri Tarun Varma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3.

Petitioner states that he is prepared to repay the loan dues provided he is extended facility to deposit the same in instalments.

Respondents, represented by their counsel/s, have no objection to the above.

In view of the above, we direct that the respondents, their agents, servants, employees, officers etc. shall not proceed to recover the loan amount in question nor proceed with attachment/auction sale etc. (subject matter of this writ petition), provided the petitioner makes deposits as follows:-

1.Petitioner shall make an initial deposit of Rs. 7,00,000/- within one month from today.

2.Petitioner shall pay balance amount in 4 equal quarterly instalments on or before 30th of the relevant month; instalment period for computing Ist instalment shall commence from the day following the day when one month period referred in clause I shall end.

3.Petitioner shall approach the Respondent-Bank in writing, while paying 3rd instalment and on so being approached, the Bank shall furnish, within three weeks of receipt of request, detailed account statement giving full particulars indicating all past deposits and dues up to date, along with such documents as may be claimed by the petitioner. Petitioner may file objection within three weeks of receipt of account statement, bank shall communicate decision in three weeks of receipts of objection, if any, and the balance amount, if any, shall be deposited as 4th instalment as per direction of the Bank.

4.Any amount already deposited under above loan account shall be duly adjusted and taken care of.

5.In case, petitioner makes payments as per schedule prescribed above and complies with all the conditions contained therein, no amount as collection charges shall be recovered.

6.But in case petitioner  commits default of any of the above conditions, this order shall stand vacated automatically on the date of default itself without further reference to the Court and petitioner will become liable to pay collection charges also.

   If the petitioner feels aggrieved against the calculations given in the account statement he may seek his remedy, without being prejudiced by this order in any manner, as may be available in law.

     Writ petition is disposed of finally subject to above directions. No order as to costs.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.