Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Manmohan Krishna Upadhyaya v. The State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. - 54621 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 17606 (12 November 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 54621 of 2007

Manmohan Krishna Upadhyaya Vs. State of U.P. and others

Hon'ble S. Rafat Alam, J.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at the outset stated that he is not pressing the reliefs No. (b), (c) and (d) and is confining this writ petition only to the extent the prayer has been made in relief No. (a) i.e. seeking mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide petitioner's matter for financial concurrence which is pending before him.

It is said that pursuant to the Government Order dated 17.04.1998, permitting the Committee of Management to make appointment on honorarium basis, the petitioner has been selected by the Committee of Management, Udit Narain Snatkottar Mahavidyalaya, Padrauna, District Kushinagar, respondent no. 5 and the recommendation for his appointment has been sent for approval to the respondent no. 2 vide letter dated 21.11.2006 but till date the respondent no. 2 has not passed any order.

Learned Standing Counsel at this stage submitted that in case any final order has not been passed by the respondent no. 2 on the reference made by the Committee of Management vide letter dated 21.11.2006, the same shall be decided expeditiously.

In view thereof, we dispose of this writ petition finally directing the respondent no. 2 to take final decision on the reference made by the Committee of Management vide letter dated 21.11.2006 with respect to appointment of petitioner on honorarium basis and pass appropriate order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.