Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Ramesh Chandnra & Another v. State Of U.P. & Another - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 3793 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3204 (26 February 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

This application is filed by the applicants , who are two  in number,with a prayer that the charge sheet of the case crime no.   229 of 2006, under Sections  3/7 Essential Commodities Act  and 201 I.P.C., P.S. Meerganj , district Jaunpur  may be quashed.

From the perusal of the record it appears that on the basis of the evidence collected by the I.O. during investigation prima facie offence under the aforesaid sections is made out, therefore, the prayer for quashing the charge sheet is refused.

It is further contended that the injured had received injuries, but the injuries were simple in nature and the  applicants are  peace loving and law abiding person. They undertake that they shall co-operate with the  proceedings of the trial and  shall not tamper with the evidence. It is further contended that the applicants want to appear before the court concerned, but there is reasonable apprehension in their mind that in case they appear before the court concerned and apply for bail their bail application shall not be considered and disposed of on the same day.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants it is directed that in case the applicants appear before the court concerned  within 20 days from today and apply for bail their bail application shall  be considered and disposed of expeditiously if possible on the same day and  no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants for a period of 30 days from today.

With the above direction the application is finally disposed of .

Dated: 26.2.2007



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.