Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM PRAVESH CHAUHAN & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' REVENUE SECRETARY, FIN. & REV. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Pravesh Chauhan & Another v. State Of U.P. Thru' Revenue Secretary, Fin. & Rev. & Others - WRIT - A No. 16512 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 5632 (29 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petitioners that they have been working as Seasonal Collection Amins from the year 1979 and 1980 respectively. It has been submitted that in terms of the U.P. Collection Amins Service Rules, 1974, as amended from time to time, 35% posts of the Collection Amins are to be filled up from amongst the Seasonal Collection Amins. It has been submitted that on the basis of seniority as Seasonal Collection Amins, the petitioners would be entitled to be regularized as Collection Amins but their case for such regularization has not been considered. It has further been submitted that from January, 2007 the respondent-authorities have stopped taking work from the petitioners even as Seasonal Collection Amins. With regard to such grievances, the petitioners claim that  they have already filed several representations before the respondent-authorities, which have yet not been decided.  

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner  files a fresh comprehensive representation before the respondent no. 2, the Collector/Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Azamgarh alongwith a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of filing of the same.

It is further provided that in case if the work is available, the respondents shall continue to take work from the petitioners as Seasonal Collection Amins.  

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.  

Dt/-29.3.2007

p.s.

w.p.16512.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.