Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI versus MATA PRASAD & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Basic Shiksha Adhikari v. Mata Prasad & Others - SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 58 of 2004 [2007] RD-AH 5684 (30 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble S.Rafat Alam, J.

Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J.

Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that the power of appointment of a Class-IV Employee is vested in the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad  under the U.P. Basic Shiksha Karmchari Varg Niyamavali, 1973 and the same has to be filled up only by direct recruitment. He further submits that the contesting respondent no.1 was given appointment by the then Basic Shiksha Adhikari on casual basis on a fixed wages of Rs. 50/- only and, therefore, he could not have been promoted against a Class-IV Post. He further submits that no order in writing promoting him was ever issued by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari.

We are of the view that a prima face case for admission is made out.

Admit.

No notice is required to be issued since Smt. Durga Tiwari, Advocate has entered appearance for the contesting respondent no.1.

Considering the submissions and looking to the facts of the case and also in view of the submissions made by Sri K.S.Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant that respondent no.1, pursuant to the judgment of the Hon'ble Single Judge, has already been permitted to work as Class-IV Employee and he is being paid salary regularly but the arrears have not been paid to him on account of the reason that the very appointment is contrary to the law, it is provided that the payment of arrears of wages pursuant to the impugned judgment shall remain stayed until further orders of this Court.

Dated:30.3.2007

SKM/58/2004


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.