Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. GUJRATI DEVI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Gujrati Devi v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 17145 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6036 (3 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petitioner that he is working on a Class IV post in the office of the Chief Medical Superintendent, Siddharth Nagar. His case is that by an order dated 11.3.2006, he was transferred from Sravasti to Siddharth Nagar. After being relieved from district Sravasti on 26.6.2006, the petitioner joined duty at Siddharth Nagar on 28.6.2006. It has been submitted that although the petitioner has been working at Siddharth Nagar ever since he joined on 28.6.2006 but he is not being paid his salary despite the petitioner having filed several representations in this regard.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner  files a fresh comprehensive representation before the respondent no. 4, the Chief Medical Superintendent, District Hospital, Siddharth Nagar  alongwith a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent, in accordance with law, by a speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six weeks from the date of filing of the same.

It is further provided that whatever is found due, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within six weeks thereafter.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.        

Dt/-3.4.2007

p.s.

w.p.17145.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.