Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PREM NARAIN AWASTHI & ANOTHER versus ALLAHABAD BANK

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Prem Narain Awasthi & Another v. Allahabad Bank - WRIT - C No. 54182 of 2002 [2007] RD-AH 816 (12 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon.R.P.Misra, J.

Hon.Shishir Kumar, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Pankaj Bhatia.  

A notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been given to the petitioner.  The petitioner has got an alternative remedy to file an objection under Section 13(3-A) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.  The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.

There shall be no order as to  costs.

12.1.2007

SKD

W.P.No.54182/2002


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.