Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOTI LAL YADAV (PEON) versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Moti Lal Yadav (Peon) v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 21089 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 8406 (4 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.  No notice is being issued to the private respondents No. 4 and 5.

The only prayer pressed by the petitioner is that the direction be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner in respect of his promotional post.  Petitioner's case in the writ petition is that he was appointed as class IV employee on 27.11.1971  and since then he  is working on Class IV post but he has not been given promotion to class III post.   The petitioner has made representation to the Consolidation Commissioner on 16.11.2005 Annexure-6 to the writ petition.  Ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition directing the respondent  No. 2  the Consolidation Commissioner to consider and  take appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 16.11.2005 for promotion to Class III post expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case  and it is for the respondent no. 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner according to seniority and eligibility as and when the promotion exercise is taken place for filling up  Class III posts under the promotional quota.  

With the above observations the writ petition  is disposed of.      

D/-4.5.2007

SCS/21089


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.