High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
RAJESH AGGARWAL v. M/S AIRADS LTD. & Ors - CR-362-2006  RD-P&H 295 (20 December 2005)
CIVIL REVISION NO. 362 of 2006
DATE OF DECISION: January 19, 2006.
M/S Airads Ltd. And others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Yogesh Goel,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Vide order under challenge, application of respondent No. 1 to implead it as a party in the pending litigation was allowed by the Court below. While allowing that application, it has been found as a matter of fact that in view of facts and circumstances of the litigation, respondent No. 1 has a right to proceed against the petitioner and if it is not allowed to join the present proceedings, it will have to file a separate suit. It has also been noticed by the Court below that for effective adjudication of the matter in dispute, respondent No. 1 is a necessary party. In view of facts of this case, ratio of judgments in Reema Rani vs. Gurmukh Singh and another, 2004(4) R.C.R. (Civil) 761, and Antony Devaraj v.
Aralvaimozhi (Kurusadi) Devasahyam, 2004(3) R.C.R. (Civil) 68, are not applicable to this case. Dismissed.
January 19, 2006. ( Jasbir Singh )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.