Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUNITA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sunita v. State of Haryana & Ors - CRWP-1172-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11833 (4 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. W.P. No. 1172 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 18.12.2006

Sunita

.... PETITIONER

Versus

State of Haryana and others

..... RESPONDENTS

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior DAG, Haryana.

* * *

Petitioner Sunita has filed this habeas corpus petition for release of her husband.

Counsel for the respondent-State submits that as per the police verification, the alleged detenue was not found at the place of respondents No.4 and 5.

The alleged detenue along with petitioner is present in Court and he is free to go any where.

In view of the above, this petition has become infructuous.

Ordered accordingly.

December 18, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.