High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Manoj v. State of Haryana & Ors. - CRM-68566-M-2006  RD-P&H 12957 (21 December 2006)
Crl. Misc. No. 68566-M of 2006.
Date of Decision: January 11, 2007.
Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate
State of Haryana & Ors.
Mr. R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT,J.(ORAL)
The petitioner, who is undergoing sentence for seven years under Section 307 IPC, is aggrieved at the order dated 13.10.2006 passed by the Director General (Prisons), Haryana whereby, his request for parole for house repairs has been turned down on the ground that the same has not been recommended by the District Magistrate, Bhiwani.
From the perusal of the impugned order itself, it is apparent that the report sent by the District Magistrate, Bhiwani is too evasive and vague.
It does not specifically mention as to whether or not the petitioner owns a house in the village and if so, what is its approximate age.
For the reasons afore-stated, this petition is allowed to the extent that the impugned order dated 13.10.2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Director General (Prisons), Haryana is quashed and a direction is issued to the said Authority to reconsider the petitioner's request after obtaining a definite and clear report from the District Administration as to whether or not the petitioner's house requires repairs. Necessary orders shall be passed within one month from the date a certified copy of this order is received.
January 11, 2007. ( SURYA KANT )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.