High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Baldev Singh & Ors. v. Gurdev Kaur & Ors. - RSA-2650-2005  RD-P&H 1736 (16 March 2006)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2650 OF 2005
DATE OF DECISION: March 21, 2006
Baldev Singh & Others.
Gurdev Kaur & Others.
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
PRESENT:- Shri Karan Nehra, Advocate, for the plaintiffs/ appellants.
. . .
Both the Courts below have concurrently found it as a fact that the suit property was an agricultural property within the municipal limits and therefore, the Civil Courts had no jurisdiction to partition the suit property. The claim of the plaintiffs that there was some property which was urban in nature lying within the municipal limits, has been negatived by holding that the aforesaid property had already been sold and was not available for partition.
In view of the aforesaid fact, the only remedy available to the plaintiffs is to seek their remedy before the revenue authorities.
MARCH 21, 2006 JUDGE
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.